choosing between cloning organ and artificail organ can be easy as well as difficult. why? u might ask. u might just whoose whatever is available to u. but will u kill ur clon for "his" organ? or will you rather use artificail organ as a replacement? nobody can give a firm answer. they will consider many others issue before making any decision. this is good as we should not make any desicion without any consideration! but then, it is just a simple question. clons or machines?
according to information online, artificial organ did not perform as host organ very well. they have limitation such as short term life, foreign body reaction, imcompatible with the host tissue etc. however, people mostly wanna rely on this matter as it is only matter available and ethic to everyone.
clon, which is having 99.5% similarity of original, give better performance over human organ replacement. due to it's origin from same stem cells. but, people start criticise it as u r "killing" your own clon for organ. it sound against the religous and of cause it is banned all over most places now. the only place which still having the research on this human cloning is based in UK.
one of the online statement caught my eye:
An argument given by 'pro-life' groups is that because they believe embryos are already human, destroying them is tantamount to murder. Most scientists protest that this is irrelevant - sperm also have the potential to become human, but millions die during intercourse.
so will you support cloning over artificial? actually, nothing can subsitute the original. it is still a replacement . but it is just that how many similarity between the replacement and original.
if one day, cloning is so advance such that we have the option to replace any part of our body , will you opt for IT?
u wanna make the decision or letting God to make one for you........................?
No comments:
Post a Comment